🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all our reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, there are important updates from the Dobropillia direction.

Here, Russian forces attempting to break through toward Dobropillia are walking into an increasingly devastating Ukrainian kill zone, where even the smallest available shelter has become a deadly trap. Despite months of fighting, Russian troops have failed to establish secure control over Bilytske, forcing commanders to continue sending reinforcements through Rodynske and across exposed approaches.

The Russian goal remains unchanged to push north and west, reach Dobropillia, and establish another foothold from which to expand their offensive beyond Pokrovsk. To accomplish this, Russian assault groups are advancing along two narrow routes extending from Rodynske. These approaches offer limited concealment through vegetation and terrain features, but much of the surrounding landscape consists of exposed fields, and that is precisely where Ukrainian drone operators have established their ambushes.
                  
Ukrainian reconnaissance drones continuously monitor Russian movement, while FPV operators wait for soldiers to emerge from cover. Small infiltration groups attempting to cross the open ground become vulnerable long before they reach the frontline, with the resulting casualties being enormous. During September alone, Ukraine’s Lubart Brigade, operating within the Azov Corps, reported killing three-hundred-and-sixty-one Russian soldiers and wounding another two-hundred-twenty-nine along these approaches near Rodynske.

But one location illustrates the brutality of the fighting, as Russian soldiers wounded during these attacks frequently receive no assistance or evacuation. Those capable of moving desperately search for shelter, yet the surrounding fields provide almost nowhere to hide.

One of the few available structures is a narrow funnel beneath a railway embankment, and the Russians try reaching it, hoping the concrete structure will protect them. Instead, Ukrainian operators recognized the predictable movement pattern and began monitoring the passage itself, with FPV drones positioned to intercept Russians approaching the shelter, turning what appeared to be a refuge into another deadly ambush.

Repeated Russian attempts to use the same route have reportedly left dozens of bodies around the railway crossing, with Ukrainian footage showing casualties scattered along the approaches, marking the path of successive infiltration groups, leading to the railway passage being turned into a death funnel. Yet Russian commanders continue sending additional soldiers through the surrounding fields and into it, because alternative approaches offer even little protection.

This reflects the broader failure of Russia’s offensive north of Pokrovsk, because since capturing the city in February, Russian forces have attempted to exploit this by advancing toward Dobropillia. However, Ukrainian drone defenses have reduced their progress to a costly struggle for individual positions, with nearly twenty thousand killed and more than ten thousand wounded Russians in the sector since the capture. Territorial progress has been considerably less impressive, with Russian military commentators describing advances measured in mere tens of meters.

However, time is becoming another enemy now, as the Russian commanders need to reach Dobropillia before autumn rains transform the surrounding fields into deep mud. Infiltration groups already struggling across exposed terrain would become slower, before the incoming winter introduces additional difficulties, including freezing temperatures, reduced vegetation, and even limited opportunities for concealment. Capturing Dobropillia would provide buildings, basements, and hardened positions where Russian troops could shelter, consolidate, and prepare further operations, but reaching those positions requires surviving the Ukrainian drone defenses first.

Overall, despite sacrificing thousands of soldiers along the approaches to Dobropillia, Russian forces remain unable to securely control even Bilytske or establish a substantial foothold on Dobropillia’s outskirts. The worsening weather therefore threatens to expose the limits of Russia’s capabilities beyond Pokrovsk: the Russian army captured the city, but its troops are still paying an extraordinary price simply trying to advance beyond it.

🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all our reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, there is important news from the Zaporizhia direction.

Here, Russian forces attempted to exploit the marshlands of the former Kakhovka Reservoir to stage a surprise advance toward Zaporizhzhia. However, the Ukrainian special forces turned the Russian infiltration operation into a Vietnam-style ambush that the Russians wouldn’t forget soon.

Despite the reality on the ground, the Russian Chief of the General Staff, Valery Gerasimov, announced that Russian troops had captured Malokaterynivka and were only five kilometers from Zaporizhzhia, while Vladimir Putin publicly repeated the claim, presenting it as another major Russian success.

The Russian operation unfolded across the former bed of the Kakhovka Reservoir, emptied after the destruction of the dam in two-thousand-twenty-three by the Russian army. Since then, dense vegetation has spread across the exposed terrain, creating an extraordinary landscape of young forests, marshes, and narrow waterways as the Dnipro River returns toward its original course, with the freed-up land giving fruitful ground for new plants to grow.

The environment, resembling a tropical jungle more than the conventional Ukrainian battlefield, offered Russian infiltration groups an opportunity. Dense foliage obstructs aerial reconnaissance, limits drone visibility, and allows small groups to move beneath the trees without immediately revealing their positions. Russian commanders hoped to exploit these conditions to reach Ukrainian-held territory, record another symbolic flag-planting video so their higher command could claim advancing toward Zaporizhzhia.

However, the Ukrainian military intelligence anticipated the danger and released footage showing soldiers from its Timur Special Forces Unit conducting counter-sabotage operations inside the vegetation. The Ukrainian soldiers wore specialized ghillie suits, allowing them to blend into the surrounding trees and undergrowth. The denseness of the vegetation proved as negative to the Russians as the positive they hoped to exploit, because it made it extremely difficult to traverse, making their infiltration routes extremely limited. And that is where Ukrainians set up their ambushes, establishing concealed positions and waiting for Russian infiltrators to fall into the trap.

The first Russian soldier encountered refused an opportunity to surrender and was killed. Another immediately dropped his weapon and lay on the ground, becoming a prisoner. When additional Russians ignored Ukrainian calls to surrender, the Ukrainian group requested thermal-imaging drone support. The drone helped identify concealed soldiers beneath the vegetation, while aerial explosives forced them from their hiding places.

Ukrainian troops subsequently discovered the eliminated infiltrators and continued clearing the area. Soon, another Russian group appeared, triggering a close-range firefight among the dense trees. One Russian soldier was killed, while another was captured.

The Russians themselves wore camouflage clothing intended to conceal their movements, but their equipment proved insufficient against the coordinated Ukrainian reconnaissance and ambush. A Ukrainian heavy octocopter was then brought in against another infiltration group. Its attacks killed two Russian soldiers, while the remaining fighter surrendered; Ukrainian troops provided him first aid, bandaged his wounds, and took him prisoner.

The entire engagement demonstrated how difficult fighting inside these marshlands has become, as visibility is restricted, engagements occur at extremely short distances, and conventional aerial surveillance must be combined with concealed infantry and thermal reconnaissance. Yet despite these unsuccessful infiltration attempts, Gerasimov publicly declared that Russia was on the outskirts of Zaporhizhia city.

Ukraine responded by exposing the contradiction, as Maksym Kravchuk, spokesperson for Ukraine’s Southern Group of Forces, rejected Gerasimov’s announcement and confirmed that Malokaterynivka remained under Ukrainian control. Soldiers from Ukraine’s one-hundred-twenty-eight Heavy Mechanized Brigade then recorded footage directly inside the settlement, publicly demonstrating their continued presence. Kravchuk also explained that Russian positions were approximately twenty-five kilometers from Zaporizhzhia’s southern outskirts, not five, and ridiculed the Russian command’s claims as another collection of fairy tales presented to Putin rather than an accurate description of the battlefield.

Overall, the result was particularly embarrassing because Russian forces had attempted to exploit one of the region’s most unusual environments, where thick vegetation offered opportunities for concealed movement.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there is interesting news from inside Russia itself. 

Here, Putin has now signed a decree allowing category D reservists to serve in air defense units in the Russian rear. Extraordinarily, category D reservists include those deemed unfit for military service due to loss of limbs. Soldiers who have lost a leg, arm, or other part of their body, in any way deemed unfit for frontline service, will now be used to operate complex air defense equipment used to take down Ukrainian drones and missiles in the Russian rear. The decree also allows these men to serve in Russian Bars units, officially meant to serve as reservists in the rear, but have been frequently deployed to frontline combat, most notably during the Ukrainian Zaporizhia and Kursk counteroffensives. 

The decree to allow amputees to serve in combat roles either on the frontline or in the rear is reflective of the utmost desperation within the Russian Ministry of Defense, which had appealed to Putin to sign the decree. Russian recruitment numbers are at an all-time low since the full-scale invasion began, while Russian losses are reaching record highs. Most importantly, while Russia is recruiting an average of one-thousand contract soldiers a day, daily Russian losses are reaching an average of one-thousand-three-hundred, resulting in an average recruitment shortage of three-hundred men a day, or nine-thousand men each month. 

Experts believe that after the upcoming Russian parliamentary elections on the twentieth of September this year, Putin will announce a new wave of mobilization. While the legitimacy of Russian elections is frequently cast into doubt by accusations of corruption and fraud, they continue to be a historic primer for civil unrest and political protests. After the last Russian mobilization caused major unrest in itself, Putin fears he needs to delay the official announcement of the next round till after the elections, to avoid the two mutually reinforcing each other and cause civil unrest to become unmanageable. Still, major Russian media channels are already psychologically preparing the Russian public for a new round of mobilization, discussing why it is necessary and how it would solve the problems causing the lack of results in Russia’s special military operation. 

Still, it is important to note that Russian mobilization never officially ended after Putin first announced it in September of two-thousand-twenty-two. After meeting the stated goal of three-hundred-thousand new recruits, the efforts took a quieter and more clandestine role; using deceptive practices like offering students rear-area or technical jobs only to send them to assault roles instead; making foreigners who do not speak Russian sign work or residency contracts that later turn out to be defense contracts; all the way to straight-up beatings and torture of young men doing their obligatory year of military service to force them to sign full service contracts with the army. Most notably, military analysts report that while Russian recruitment initially mainly relied on the high signing bonuses, which currently stand at thirty-thousand euros, it has increasingly been forced to rely on forced methods such as these instead; with recruiters having recently begun raiding factory floors to arrest workers, and then forcing them to sign contracts under threat of beatings for being cowards or being pro-Ukraine. These tactics become even more abhorrent when understanding that the average time between a soldier signing a contract with the Russian army and being killed in Ukraine currently stands at ten to twenty days; a process that is now widely documented and followed through Russian soldiers’ social media activity and them going offline for good. 

Overall, while Russian mobilization never formally ended, a new official announcement will allow the already aggressive recruitment practices to take place more in the open, and at a much larger scale. The practice of now allowing actual amputees to serve in reservist and air defense units will not just result in obvious failed performances against Ukrainian drone and missile attacks on the Russian rear, but it is also a sign of how desperate the situation has grown for Putin, seeking to bridge the gap till elections are concluded, with the Russian military trying to crawl itself past the finish line, but now with arms and legs missing.

🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all our reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, there are dangerous updates from Ukraine.
Here, Ukraine’s counteroffensive campaigns have been stabbed in the back by a disruption of American satellite communications. Mid-combat, Ukrainian forces discovered that Starlink terminals were losing connectivity whenever drones they were attached to exceeded certain speeds. Depending on the platform, disconnections occurred between seventy and one-hundred-and-sixty kilometers per hour.

Ukraine’s Seventh Air Assault Corps reported disruptions around Huliaipole, with Ukrainian unmanned units canceling their missions, while Ukrainian commanders scrambled to understand restrictions imposed without advance warning.

Meanwhile, the political circumstances have triggered accusations that Ukraine is being stabbed in the back by the American government, as Trump has pressured Ukraine over strikes against Russian energy infrastructure, blaming Zelensky for rising global oil prices. Yet the Middle Eastern conflict and continuing shipping risks around the Strait of Hormuz are the real major factors behind the energy-market instability, as currently around a million barrels are moved through it per day, while before the war there were twenty million per day. As a result, Ukrainian officials suspect the satellite restrictions represent another attempt to force them toward Washington’s proposed energy arrangement with Moscow.

The timing could hardly be worse, as Ukraine’s recent counteroffensives around Huliaipole, Liman and other sectors depend heavily on medium-range drones destroying Russian reinforcements before they reach the battlefield. Starlink terminals are used to identify moving trucks, ammunition convoys, troop transports, and command vehicles, then attack before the Russian targets disappear, and without reliable high-speed satellite connections, that entire process becomes considerably harder.

Russian columns could begin moving more freely through areas previously dominated by Ukrainian drones. Additional ammunition, fuel, and reinforcements could reach frontline formations, allowing Russian commanders to rebuild depleted units and prepare renewed winter assaults.

The consequences would extend beyond logistics, as Russian drone operators, previously threatened by Ukrainian strikes against their vehicles and positions, could regain operational freedom. That would increase pressure on Ukrainian infantry, complicate counterattacks, and make positions harder to defend. This threatens the operational foundation of campaigns such as Vivaldi, where months of Ukrainian strikes against Russian rear-area logistics helped prepare successful ground advances.

Long-range operations face a different challenge. Drones requiring continuous communications benefit from live course corrections, updated targeting information, and the ability to respond to changing conditions, while losing those capabilities makes missions less adaptable and less effective.

However, Ukraine’s strikes deep inside Russia generally use alternative communications and navigation systems because Starshield is geographically restricted. Consequently, the immediate disruption primarily threatens mid-range operations and air defense rather than stopping Ukraine’s strategic strikes.

The defensive consequences are particularly alarming, as Ukraine increasingly relies on interceptor drones to destroy incoming Russian Shaheds before they reach cities and energy infrastructure. These systems require rapid coordination, targeting updates, and reliable communication while pursuing fast-moving targets, and if satellite connectivity disappears during acceleration, interception opportunities shrink dramatically. More Russian drones could penetrate Ukrainian defenses, forcing missile batteries, electronic-warfare systems, and conventional weapons to compensate, which would result in additional pressure on the already stretched Ukrainian defenses and potentially more civilian casualties.

At the same time, responsibility for the cutoff remains disputed, as Elon Musk declared that Starshield operates under American government control, with restrictions ultimately determined by the US military and the president. The White House denied ordering the limitations, while American officials reportedly suggested a technical malfunction, with all sides shifting the blame. Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski publicly challenged Musk over the treatment of his European customers, reminding him that Poland helps finance Ukraine’s satellite connectivity. As a result, some service was restored, with Ukrainian officials reporting improved connectivity up to one-hundred-and-sixty kilometers per hour.

🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all our reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, the biggest news comes from Bulgaria.

Here, a major sabotage attack has destroyed most of the Starlink infrastructure at a secret facility near Sofia, after two masked individuals deliberately set fire to eleven of the seventeen antennas installed at the site. The attack immediately raised alarm because these antennas were connected to the Starlink satellite network and provided communications that are also used by Ukraine during the war, meaning an act of arson directly damaged infrastructure supporting Ukrainian connectivity far beyond its own borders. Bulgarian member of parliament Ivaylo Mirchev revealed the incident publicly and accused the authorities of remaining silent, while questioning how two attackers were able to reach a secured communications facility and destroy nearly two thirds of its antennas without being stopped. He also criticized Bulgaria’s security services for failing to prevent what he described as suspected Russian sabotage. Bulgaria’s security chief later explained that part of the station’s fencing had been removed during expansion work, making it easier for the attackers to reach the antennas.

Ukraine depends on Starlink because the system allows military units to maintain communications even when conventional networks are unavailable near the front. More than fifty thousand Starlink terminals have been delivered to Ukraine since the beginning of the full scale invasion, supporting the military alongside hospitals, emergency services, schools, energy facilities, local authorities, and businesses during blackouts and communications outages. On the battlefield, terminals connect directly with satellites overhead, allowing soldiers to transmit battlefield information, coordinate movements, relay reconnaissance from drones, and keep commanders connected with units across large distances. Starlink is also resistant to many forms of Russian electronic jamming, which made satellite connections especially valuable for controlling drones where ordinary radio links become unreliable. The antennas near Sofia support this system from the ground by exchanging data with Starlink satellites and routing that traffic into local internet networks, helping complete the connection between users in Ukraine and the wider communications network behind the constellation.

The significance of the attack grew further when, shortly afterward, Ukrainian forces reported serious disruptions to the military version of Starlink called Starshield. Ukrainian attack and air defense drones using the system suddenly began losing their connections once they exceeded roughly one hundred sixty kilometers per hour, disrupting missions without any advance warning to the units operating them. Ukrainian troops then recorded interruptions lasting between ten and twenty seconds during flight, making drones difficult to control and forcing several missions to be cancelled. At the same time, Ukraine went two consecutive nights without receiving the usual warning from its partners about Russian ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv. These warnings depend partly on the American Space Based Infrared System, whose satellites detect the intense heat produced when ballistic missiles launch, and Europe currently has no equivalent system capable of immediately replacing it. The connection to Washington became even more direct when Elon Musk stated that limits on Starshield speed or usage are decided by the United States military and ultimately by the president. As Trump pressures Ukraine over its long range operations, Ukrainian forces are now facing restrictions on drone communications, gaps in missile warning data, and the destruction of Starlink infrastructure supporting the network from Bulgaria all at once.

Overall, the attack in Bulgaria exposes Europe’s dependence on infrastructure it cannot readily replace, because the systems keeping Ukraine connected now extend across allied territory while no European network can match Starlink at the same scale. That dependence means protecting Ukraine’s communications increasingly requires protecting ground infrastructure inside Europe itself, from satellite terminals and relay sites to the power systems that keep them running. It also gives Washington enormous influence over Ukrainian operations, because restrictions on American controlled satellite links and missile warning data can immediately affect what Ukrainian forces are able to see, coordinate, and strike. Europe is therefore being pushed toward building its own resilient communications and early warning architecture, since every delay leaves another part of Ukraine’s military network dependent on systems that either Russia can attack or the United States can restrict.

🔴 Our interactive news map: https://www.rfunews.com/map
🔴 Subscribe to unlock full access to the map + exclusive strategic insights: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

In this video, we will analyze important developments in the Baltic Sea.

Here, Ukraine has just started to demolish Russia’s Baltic Fleet with long-range drone strikes. The targets of the devastating blow have become the warships responsible for protecting Russian tanker routes.

Recent footage shows a large-scale Ukrainian drone strike reaching beyond Saint Petersburg, more than one thousand and one hundred kilometers from the Ukrainian border. During it, Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces hit a Russian corvette twice while it was undergoing repairs in a dry dock at Kronstadt. The attack is especially notable because the vessel is new and equipped with the latest anti-ship, anti-submarine, and air-defense systems. These capabilities allowed it to serve as an armed escort vessel for shadow fleet tankers transiting through the Baltic Sea. The timing of the strike was also embarrassing for Russia, as Saint Petersburg was hosting an economic forum where Vladimir Putin was expected to highlight the strength and stability of the Russian economy.

The reason why Ukrainian drone operators targeted the vessel is exactly its role in escorting tankers belonging to Russia’s shadow fleet through international waters, including the English Channel. By degrading the combat capabilities of the Baltic Fleet, Ukraine can deprive Russian cargo vessels of receiving naval escorts, a key element of Russia’s plan to deter sanction enforcement by European countries. With the limited number of ships Russia has to fulfill this role, each successful strike cripples Russian abilities to do so further. At the same time, the strike also broadens opportunities for international pressure on Russia as the effectiveness of its navy declines, so European countries can intercept the undefended Russian oil tankers without any risk of escalation. For example, French authorities capitalized on the lack of armed escorts and boarded a tanker linked to the shadow fleet and detained its captain.

The significance of the strike is that it affects the protection of tankers starting from Russia’s Baltic ports, which have become the primary export points for Russian oil. Despite also being targeted by the Ukrainians, they are still regarded as slightly more secure than those in the Black Sea, which is under Ukrainian fire control with naval and long-range drones. Now, Russia exports approximately fifty percent of its seaborne crude oil from its Baltic Sea ports, which makes it heavily reliant on this route. However, the oil tankers going through here need to be escorted by warships to dissuade interception at sea by Ukraine’s European allies, which has been happening increasingly often. Notably, the Russian naval escorts create an effective political deterrent against boardings at sea, proven by the track record of unhindered passage of Russian tankers through European waters.

Since the end of March, approximately three hundred vessels from Russia's shadow fleet have transited through British waters, most of them via the English Channel. Despite this, not a single vessel was stopped or inspected, leading Russian commentators to boast that European countries are unwilling to intervene, and the presence of even a single Russian escort warship was enough to deter them. However, the Russian Baltic Fleet losses will change this balance of power in Europe’s and Ukraine’s favor because Russia will increasingly be unable to project power.

By targeting Russian warships and reducing their number, Ukraine is indirectly making it easier for Nato countries to take action against vessels associated with Russia's shadow fleet. Here, Ukraine is using the same strategy as it did in the Black Sea, where approximately thirty percent of Russia’s fleet has been destroyed since two thousand and twenty-two. Notably, this follows the same pattern as it is not the first successful strike against Baltic Fleet assets. At Primorsk Port, Ukrainian forces damaged a guided-missile corvette and a patrol boat. In another attack, Ukrainian drones struck a patrol icebreaker, which is a dual-purpose vessel used by the FSB Border Service that combines military capabilities with icebreaking functions.

Overall, these strikes contribute to a steady erosion of Russia's naval capabilities in the Baltic region. As a result, Russia has an increasingly limited pool of warships that can be assigned to escort and protect vessels linked to its shadow fleet, enabling European countries to intercept sanctioned Russian vessels. The ultimate target is not the ships themselves, but Russia's ability to protect oil exports and generate revenue for the war effort.

🔴 Our interactive news map: https://www.rfunews.com/map
🔴 Subscribe to unlock full access to the map + exclusive strategic insights: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

In the skies above the frontline, the Ukrainian air force unleashed a devastating series of J-dam bombardments on Russian positions. After securing one of the largest J-dam resupply packages since the start of the war, the Ukrainian air forces stopped rationing them and started conducting constant strikes on the Russian lines.

Recently, the United States has approved a major three-hundred-seventy-three-million-dollar package that includes more than one thousand five hundred J-dam bombs for Ukraine. The package will be financed through a combination of Ukrainian funds and monetary contributions from European Nato countries. Particularly important is that this is the Extended Range variant that adds deployable wings that allow bombs to glide up to eighty kilometers after release, combining GPS and inertial navigation systems, enabling the bombs to accurately strike fixed targets in any weather conditions. This enables Ukrainian aircraft to attack Russian positions from much safer distances while remaining outside many Russian frontline air defense ranges.

With more bombs secured, Ukraine has increasingly stepped up its J-dam campaign on Russian command-and-control infrastructure and logistics facilities to break the backbone of Russian battlefield operations, including facilities near Huliaipole and the broader Zaporizhia Region. Additional strikes targeted railway bridges north of Siversk that were being used for logistics and troop deployments. Such attacks degrade Russia’s ability to coordinate operations while disrupting the movement of supplies, reinforcements, and ammunition to frontline units.

Ukrainian aircraft continued their campaign with operations against enemy drone operator posts. They repeatedly targeted a mining complex east of Rodynske, where Russian drone operators had been observed on multiple occasions. A Ukrainian Su-twenty-seven struck the site with J-dam extended-range bombs, followed by another precision strike that destroyed a building, housing operators of the elite Russian Rubicon unit. The fact that the same complex was attacked several days in a row suggests Ukraine deliberately ensured surviving operators could not resume operations.

Additional strikes hit Russian drone command posts near Huliaipole and Pidhirne, while another Mig-twenty-nine destroyed one such control point in Plavni together with personnel, equipment, and ammunition. These attacks are strategically important because they reduce Russian drone reconnaissance and strike activity simultaneously. Without drones, Russian assault groups lose their primary source of battlefield awareness, making attacks slower, less coordinated, and significantly more vulnerable to Ukrainian defenses.

After command centers and drone operators were neutralized, Ukrainian aircraft increasingly focused on Russian troop concentrations. A Su-twenty-seven struck an enemy concentration near Siversk with J-dam bombs, while other airstrikes targeted Russian assault troops concentrated in former substations, multi-story buildings, and mining facilities near Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Rodynske, and Udachne. In many cases, these positions housed troops awaiting orders, reinforcements, or preparation for assaults. By eliminating such concentrations, Ukraine not only inflicts casualties but also disrupts future offensive operations before they begin.

The significance of the newly approved package with more than one thousand five hundred J-dam bombs is hard to underestimate, as it is the largest single precision-strike package Ukraine has received. Previously, Ukrainian commanders often had to conserve these weapons for only the highest-priority targets. A predictable replenishment pipeline now allows precision airstrikes to become routine battlefield tools rather than occasional opportunities.

Ukraine has already been using J-dam bombs since two thousand twenty three by integrating them onto Soviet-era Mig-twenty-nine and Su-twenty-seven fighter jets. Ukrainian engineers developed custom interfaces that allow these aircraft to carry and employ Western precision munitions despite being designed decades before such weapons existed. When using non-extended range variants of the J-dam, Ukrainian pilots typically fly at low altitude to avoid detection, then briefly climb before performing a lofted release. The bomb glides toward pre-programmed coordinates while the aircraft immediately turns away, minimizing exposure to Russian air defenses. However, with extended-range variants now on the way, Ukrainian jets can launch these bombs from up to eighty kilometers away, ensuring the safety of the craft and pilot by staying out of reach of the already few Russian air defenses that dare to come close to the frontline.

🔴 YOU ARE MISSING HALF OF OUR VIDEOS! Subscribe to unlock all our reports and support our work: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCcNB1tZYpeDetqCad

Today, the biggest news is coming from the Black Sea.

Here, four commercial vessels have now been struck across two separate waves of drone attacks near Bulgarian waters, marking a major escalation in Russia’s expanding campaign against shipping in the Black Sea. In the latest attacks, the Malta flagged Chelsea Three was struck by three aerial drones roughly thirty three kilometers from the Bulgarian coast, forcing all fifteen crew members to evacuate, with five needing medical treatment. A second vessel was attacked roughly thirty one kilometers from shore and sank, with Bulgarian rescue forces dispatched to the area. These strikes came only one week after another two merchant vessels were attacked in Bulgaria’s maritime economic zone, when one ship sank and another caught fire, leaving sailors injured and forcing another large rescue operation. The latest strikes occurred inside Bulgaria’s exclusive economic zone, where wartime military operations can be legal, but only around ten kilometers beyond Bulgaria’s territorial waters, placing active Russian attacks extremely close to the sovereign territory of a Nato member. Russia’s campaign against maritime traffic connected to Ukraine has now produced four strikes around the maritime zone of a Nato member in little more than a week, bringing active wartime attacks directly toward Bulgaria’s coastline and forcing Sofia to respond. With these strikes occurring only thirty kilometers from the Bulgarian coastline, the real danger to the Nato country was immense, with Russia showing little due regard to neutral vessels’ operations.

These attacks come after Russia spent months intensifying a campaign designed to isolate Ukraine from maritime trade by making every voyage to its Black Sea ports increasingly dangerous. Russian forces have repeatedly targeted ships, port infrastructure, the Danube ports, and transport links connecting the Odesa region with the rest of the country, while Russian sources themselves describe almost daily strikes against the Greater Odesa port cluster throughout September. The pressure has already driven up shipping and insurance costs and forced vessels to search for safer routes farther west, with some gathering near Romania to increase their distance from Ukrainian ports and areas under regular Russian attack. Yet the latest vessels struck near Bulgaria had not even departed from Ukrainian seaports, with Chelsea Three sailing from Turkey toward the Danube when it was attacked. Russia’s effort to choke Ukrainian maritime traffic is therefore reaching commercial vessels beyond the Ukrainian port system itself, while those ships are operating around the maritime zone of a Nato country.

Bulgaria has now moved from monitoring the attacks to confronting Russia directly, summoning Russian ambassador Eleonora Mitrofanova after an emergency meeting of the country’s Security Council. Prime Minister Rumen Radev described the strikes as unacceptable and announced that Sofia is seeking assistance from both the European Union and Nato to determine the drones’ origin and strengthen surveillance of Bulgarian airspace and the Black Sea coast. Radev also opened talks with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte, making the attacks a direct subject of coordination between Bulgaria and Nato. The previous wave of strikes had already pushed Sofia to approve the emergency purchase of five additional air defense systems under the European Sky Shield Initiative, showing that these incidents are already changing Bulgaria’s military posture along the coast. Investigators have not yet established conclusive evidence identifying the drones, yet the diplomatic response has already centered on Moscow and the Bulgarian government is preparing stronger defenses against further attacks. After four commercial vessels were struck in little more than a week, every new incident now increases the pressure on Nato to expand surveillance and air defense coverage over the western Black Sea.

Overall, repeated attacks around Bulgaria are pushing Nato toward tighter protection of commercial shipping across the western Black Sea, with more surveillance, coastal air defenses, and faster tracking of incoming drones. As Sofia strengthens its defenses and coordinates more closely with Nato, Russian drones operating near Bulgarian waters will face a denser network of sensors and interceptors covering the routes used by civilian vessels. Further attacks will give Bulgaria and other Black Sea members stronger reasons to expand patrols and air defense coverage, bringing Nato military assets closer to the areas where Russia is conducting its maritime campaign. Russia’s effort to isolate Ukraine at sea is therefore creating the conditions for a larger Nato presence along the same shipping routes Moscow is trying to disrupt.

💎 Special Offer: starting from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Russia’s worsening air-defense crisis is now forcing the Russian command to urgently put ordinary civilians in improvised military units, sharply increasing the number of deadly accidents, which we will review in this report. Authorities in the Krasnodar Region have announced that employees of local enterprises will be recruited into mobile fire groups tasked with protecting factories, infrastructure, and other rear-area targets from Ukrainian drones. Workers will reportedly receive fifty-thousand rubles, or around five-hundred-and-thirty-seven euros and sign contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defense, although officials insist they will not be deployed to active combat zones. The measure reflects Russia’s shortage not only of air defense missiles and functioning air-defense systems, but also of trained personnel capable of operating them across the country’s enormous territory.

However, the arrangement contains a serious risk, as once a civilian signs a Defense Ministry contract, that person falls under military authority, regardless of verbal promises from regional officials. More importantly, mobile fire groups would usually require careful selection, discipline, communication and coordination, and extensive weapons training. Simply giving factory employees rifles or heavy machine guns and ordering them to shoot at drones is unlikely to create an effective defense. Instead, poorly trained crews waste ammunition, fire into populated areas, or bring down aircraft directly onto the civilians they are supposedly protecting.

Russia’s desperation is understandable because Ukrainian attacks are becoming relentless, and even Russian sources admitted that approximately three thousand Ukrainian drone and missile strikes were observed during a single week. The geography of these raids is also expanding beyond Crimea, border regions, and Moscow toward the deep Russian rear. At the same time, Ukrainian drones are becoming faster, more resilient to Russian electronic warfare, and increasingly difficult to stop, meaning improvised mobile teams with almost no training are already struggling against threats beyond their capabilities.

The catastrophic consequences were demonstrated on a crowded beach in Gelendzhik. Russian air-defense personnel fired at and shot down an incoming Ukrainian drone without considering where the wreckage would fall. The aircraft crashed directly among beachgoers laying on the sand and exploded in a massive fireball. Seven people, including three children, were reportedly killed, while more than sixty others were injured. Russian officials accused Ukraine of deliberately targeting civilians, but videos filmed by bystanders contradicts this, and clearly shows how Russian air defense had brought the drone down onto the beach with complete disregard for the consequences.

The incident became even more disturbing because the mobile group was reportedly protecting not an essential military facility or major industrial site, but one of Vladimir Putin’s residences near Gelendzhik. Russian civilians therefore died because an inadequately trained crew prioritized preventing damage to Putin’s vacation home over calculating the danger to hundreds of people below. After the Russian accusations, Andriy Kovalenko, head of the Ukrainian Centre for Countering Disinformation, said in a statement that it was Putin who killed these Russians, and had he not started the war, the strikes on Ukraine, and forcibly put untrained personnel in charge of heavy weaponry, these people would still be alive.

Russian training footage demonstrated how reckless these improvised formations can become, as during one exercise, a mobile fire group mounted a heavy machine gun onto a truck. The weapon was originally designed for the Mi-Twenty-Four helicopter and was not intended for manual ground operation. Its recoil and weight caused a soldier to be thrown from the vehicle, the gun shooting uncontrolled in all directions and nearly turning the exercise into another fatal incident for everyone involved.

In Russian-controlled Sevastopol in Crimea, the danger came directly from an armed serviceman, who was given a weapon without proper selection. He opened fire on fellow soldiers, killing one and wounding another, before shooting civilians as well. Three civilians were killed and three more wounded before the attacker was detained. The event demonstrated what can happen when armed personnel are deployed without proper screening, combat, or psychological preparation.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, there are important updates from the Pokrovsk direction.

Here, a significant Ukrainian force concentration is taking shape around Pokrovsk as the Ukrainian command prepares to counter Russia’s attempts to reinforce its infiltrations. 

Ukraine’s Two-Hundred-Twenty-Fifth Separate Assault Regiment has now been placed under the operational control of the Seventh Rapid Response Corps of the Air Assault Forces. This does not permanently incorporate the regiment into the corps. Instead, it will conduct missions inside its area of responsibility directly under corps command, eliminating coordination problems created when assault formations operated inside the sector without answering to the same headquarters.

This is particularly significant because it follows another similar reinforcement, as you may remember from a previous report. The Four-Hundred-Twenty-Fifth Separate Assault Regiment Skala was transferred under the operational command of the First Azov Corps, with several battalions and the regimental command moving into Azov’s sector during late August. Skala has already participated in clearing operations, while Ukrainian commanders report improved coordination and reduced personnel losses. Both the First Azov Corps and Seventh Rapid Response Corps operate across overlapping parts of the broader Pokrovsk sector, with the two powerful corps formations now being reinforced with specialized assault regiments precisely as Russian activity intensifies north of Pokrovsk.

The immediate catalyst for this decision is the expanding grey zone Russia has created toward Dobropillia. Russian infiltrators have penetrated deep behind the conventional frontline, with groups reportedly reaching Bilozerske, approximately five kilometers north of Dobropillia. This does not mean Russia controls the intervening territory, as Russian glide-bomb strikes against locations inside this area themselves indicate a lack of stable control there. However, dispersed infiltrators are attempting to create footholds through which larger assault formations can subsequently move, which requires immediate reaction from the Ukrainian units defending the area to eliminate this threat.

For now, Russian groups continue to encounter prepared Ukrainian defensive obstacles, as geolocated Ukrainian drone footage shows Russian infantry attempting to cross fortification lines near Dobropillia before being attacked by Ukrainian drones. Trenches, barbed wire, and dragon’s teeth slow soldiers precisely when they are most exposed, and every additional minute spent trying to overcome obstacles provides Ukrainian drone operators another opportunity to launch FPV’s and destroy the enemy before they reach Ukrainian positions.

However, Azov reports that Russia is gathering reserves for another offensive attempt, as Russian troops continue infiltrating, supported by an enormous drone presence, and through this they’re trying to outflank both Dobropillia and Kostiantynivka-Druzhkivka. Ukrainian troops in the area reported approximately three hundred Russian drones operating within one area of responsibility during a single day.

That makes clearing infiltrators considerably harder, as Ukrainian assault troops searching forests and settlements must simultaneously evade Russian FPV’s and reconnaissance drones. Russia has also reportedly moved artillery closer to the frontline, accepting greater vulnerability to Ukrainian counterbattery attacks and drones in exchange for stronger immediate fire support for the infiltration attempts.

The Russian objective in the Pokrovsk direction is to convert the grey zone into consolidated control before pushing directly toward Dobropillia and Druzhkivka. Ukraine, however, is preparing to contest exactly that transition, as the transferred units to reinforce the corps are experienced assault formations capable of systematically clearing dispersed Russian groups and holding a coherent frontline. This would resemble the pattern preceding earlier Ukrainian counteroffensives this year: destroy infiltrators, consolidate the grey zone, secure logistics and drone corridors, and only afterward transition toward larger offensive actions.

Overall, Russia is accumulating troops, drones, and artillery for another attempt to turn infiltration into a breakthrough in the Pokrovsk direction. However, Ukraine’s response is increasingly visible, as elite formations are being concentrated under corps-level command to stop that breakthrough before it consolidates. The arrival of another assault regiment indicates Ukraine is preparing not merely to contain Russian infiltration, but to clear the contested territory, restore control, and potentially create the conditions for the next Ukrainian counteroffensive.

💎 Help us expand the coverage! Subscription starts from just $4.99! Get 50% OFF full access to the map + exclusive strategic updates: https://www.rfunews.com/pricing

Today, the biggest news comes from the Russian Federation.

Here, Ukraine’s Navy reported that it struck the Russian frigate Admiral Essen in the port of Novorossiysk with a Neptune missile. The Admiral Essen is a carrier of Kalibr cruise missiles, which Russia uses to launch long range strikes against targets in Ukraine. The same operation also hit two other Kalibr missile carriers, a Buyan M class corvette and the frigate Admiral Makarov, with the Makarov suffering damage to its port side. These attacks come after Ukraine had already targeted both frigates in August, demonstrating that the Russian Black Sea Fleet is facing repeated attacks. According to the Ukrainian Navy, the purpose of these operations is to systematically degrade the Russian fleet’s ability to conduct combat operations, particularly its capacity to launch missiles against Ukraine. The naval strikes are also part of a much broader Ukrainian campaign aimed at destroying the platforms Russia relies on to attack Ukrainian cities. 

This strategy was demonstrated again in an earlier operation during which Ukrainian drones travelled eight hundred kilometers to reach Engels airbase, where they struck a Russian Tu ninety five strategic bomber. Satellite imagery captured the aftermath of the kamikaze drone attack, indicating that the aircraft was destroyed in the strike. Another Tu ninety five that had been damaged in an earlier Ukrainian strike was also visible at the airbase, proving the growing success of these strikes. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that SBU Alpha special forces carried out the operation against the bomber, which also serves as a carrier for Russia’s long range cruise missiles. These bombers are particularly important targets because they can launch cruise missiles from hundreds of kilometers away, allowing them to attack Ukrainian cities while remaining far outside the range of Ukrainian air defense systems. By reaching the aircraft while they are still on the ground, Ukraine can therefore bypass that distance advantage and directly attack one of the platforms Russia depends on for its long range missile campaign.

To further complement these strikes, Ukrainian forces also targeted an Iskander M ballistic missile launcher on Russian territory near the Ukrainian border. The targeted position was used to launch Iskander and Zircon missiles towards Ukraine, making it a particularly important target for Ukraine. Unlike fixed missile installations, these launchers can rapidly relocate along Russia’s road network and change firing positions, making them much harder to detect and destroy. Successfully locating and striking one therefore demonstrates that Ukraine can reach Russia’s mobile missile forces despite their ability to relocate and change firing positions.

This strategy is becoming increasingly important because Ukraine cannot afford to rely solely on intercepting incoming missiles, which requires expensive interceptors available only in limited quantities. By attacking the platforms that launch missiles instead, Ukraine can prevent attacks before they begin. Destroying a bomber, damaging a warship, or eliminating a mobile missile launcher not only removes an immediate threat, but can also reduce Russia’s ability to carry out repeated strikes and ease the enormous pressure placed on Ukraine’s air defense network. According to Bloomberg, Putin is considering heavier ballistic missile strikes against Kyiv, aiming to eventually launch as many as two hundred missiles in a single attack. Russia is currently capable of launching around seventy seven missiles simultaneously, meaning that Moscow is seeking to dramatically increase the number of missiles it can fire. This is why Ukraine’s strategy of hunting down the launch platforms themselves is becoming increasingly significant. 

Overall, Ukraine is trying to change the economics of the missile war, which Russia uses to destroy Ukrainian cities. Russia can manufacture and launch more weapons, but losses reduce available launch capacity and complicate preparations. If Ukraine can repeatedly force Russia to hide or relocate its strike systems, Moscow’s missile arsenal becomes less useful. The real objective is therefore not simply interception, but making Russia’s long range strikes difficult to sustain.

این هفته در «برنامه با کامبیز حسینی»، ماراتن تریبون آزاد برگزار می‌شود؛ از امشب تا پنجشنبه، موضوع برنامه را شما تعیین می‌کنید!
اگر فقط فرصت داشتید یک جمله به یک ایران بگویید، چه می‌گفتید؟

این هفته در «برنامه با کامبیز حسینی»، ماراتن تریبون آزاد برگزار می‌شود؛ تا پنجشنبه، موضوع برنامه را شما تعیین می‌کنید!
اگر فقط فرصت داشتید یک جمله به یک ایران بگویید، چه می‌گفتید؟

«برنامه» صدای شماست.
اگر در ایران به اینترنت دسترسی دارید، بیایید و مشاهدات خود را بگویید.
ما شما را، بدون نوبت، مستقیم از ایران روی خط می‌آوریم.
بیایید و روایت خود را برای همیشه ثبت کنید.
تاریخ با صدای شما نوشته می‌شود.

در یک ماه گذشته، برای پیدا کردن کدام دارو یا دریافت کدام درمان با مشکل روبه‌رو شده‌اید؟ دارو پیدا نشد، قیمتش چند برابر شد یا بیمه هزینه‌اش را نپرداخت؟ آیا ناچار شده‌اید دارویتان را کمتر مصرف کنید، درمانتان را عقب بیندازید یا برای خرید دارو از پول غذا، اجاره یا مخارج بچه‌ها بزنید؟ امشب در «برنامه با کامبیز حسینی»، صدای شما موضوع اصلی است.

یک شب مانده به چهارمین سالگرد قتل حکومتی مهسا ژینا امینی، گزارش‌هایی از بازگشت گشت ارشاد و نیروهای لباس‌شخصی به خیابان‌ها منتشر شده است. خیابان‌های شهر شما چه وضعی دارند؟ آیا شهر را قرق کرده‌اند؟
امشب در «برنامه»، تصویر خیابان‌ها را از زبان خود مردم می‌شنویم.

امشب در «برنامه»، موضوع را شما تعیین کردید. از زندگی این روزها در شهر و محله‌تان گفتید؛ از نگرانی‌ها، امیدها و مطالبه‌هایی که باید شنیده شوند. شما اگر فقط فرصت گفتن یک جمله به ایران را داشتید، چه می‌گفتید؟

آموزش‌وپرورش در چرخه‌ای از اختلال گرفتار شده است. مهر ۱۴۰۵ از راه می‌رسد و هزینه‌های سنگین مدرسه و خطر بازماندن کودکان از تحصیل، خانواده‌های بسیاری را نگران کرده است. هزینهٔ تهیهٔ لوازم مدرسه برای یک دانش‌آموز به ۱۵ میلیون تومان رسیده؛ رقمی که برای بسیاری از خانواده‌ها به‌معنای حذف یکی دیگر از نیازهای زندگی است. تصویر بحران آموزش ایران را در این «برنامه با کامبیز حسینی» ببینید.

در کرمان قرار بود بنزینِ مازاد بر سهمیه با نرخ لیتری ۸۷ هزار و ۲۰۰ تومان عرضه شود؛ این طرح پیش از آغاز فروش متوقف شد، اما بحث «نرخ چهارم» همچنان روی میز است. به نظر می‌رسد حکومت راهی جز افزایش قیمت بنزین ندارد؛ اما اگر بنزین دوباره گران شود، مردم چه خواهند کرد؟

چرا موجودی حساب برخی از مشتریان بانک ملی صفر شده است؟ اختلال فنی یا دست‌درازی به پول مردم؟ «برنامه با کامبیز حسینی» امشب صدای مردمی است که از نظام بانکی جمهوری اسلامی آسیب دیده‌اند.